man and woman-exegesis of biblical texts
HOW TO TIE THE WHOLE PASSAGE TOGETHER INTO A COHERENT COMPLETE INTEGRATED ARGUMENT. The meaning of and purpose of the background information about woman’s hair, men’s hair and bald heads. (Note: This section is taken directly from my Word Document on 1 Cor 11:2-16 so you will note it mentions Chapter 4 etc … This document is available by contacting me.) I
The Underlying Theology. Discussions about angels and exousia may be interesting BUT what is really important is that we understand and believe the Underlying Theology of the creation of man and woman that Paul presents in 1 Cor 11:2-16. Introduction.A. It seems that the Corinthian church was basically doing what Paul had instructed them to do – women covering and
Analysing and categorising the different types of arguments and information being used by Paul in 1 Cor 11:2-16 I have argued in the first 2 instalments and in further replies that Paul’s main argument is clear and direct “man ought not” and “woman ought to”. I have also argued that it is essential to delineate this main argument and to
INSTALMENT 2 – Exegetically determining what “exousia/authority on the head” means. It is referrring to neither man’s authority nor to woman’s authority. What does 1 Cor 11:10 “authority on the head” mean? A SIMPLE EXEGETICAL PROPOSAL. I don’t intend to list the different views and translations, other than to say the fact that some translations need to add extra words into the
Word Order in 1 Cor 11:10-12 The Angels are in the Wrong Place. INSTALMENT 1A 1 Cor 11:1012 has some major issues that have rendered many opinions and much discussion. The 2 major ones are in verse 10. a. what is meant by the angels and in particular what is meant by it as a condition for a woman having exousia
It is nearly universally stated that Paul is comparing a woman without a head-covering (in church) to a a woman with a shaved head (presumably a prostitute). It thus seems that Paul is being exceedingly nasty, in that he is saying that the uncovered woman in church is just the same as (one and the same) a loose woman. It
5 Article Series. And God said: Let us make Adam in our image. Article 5. Adam the image of God—the key to knowing God. We know God by looking at Adam. Referencing back to article 2 In article 2 we left the text of Genesis 1 with two similar singularity/plurality enigmas, one in regard to man (or more correctly in regard
5 Article Series. And God said: Let us make Adam in our image. Article 4. The details of Gender and the image of God. In the previous article I concluded that essential sameness and differentiated personhood are mutually inclusive. That is, you cannot have one without the other. Thus, differentiated personhood is not just an incidental, rather, it is fundamental
Series. And God said: Let us make Adam in our image. Article 3. The solution to the enigma and the content of the image of God. Adam is from the ground. In Genesis 2, we are given an in-depth look at Adam and so it is there that we find our answer to the singularity/plurality enigma of Genesis 1 and
5 Article Series. And God said: Let us make Adam in our image. Article 2. The enigma of Adam being singular and plural. The problem In the previous article, we looked at how the text compels us to translate adam of 1:26 and 2:5, not as mankind, but as Adam. However, if we do so, Genesis 1 seems to say some