manandwoman-exegeticalblog.com

man and woman-exegesis of biblical texts

By - manan251

1 Corinthians 11:2-16 Instalment 5

HOW TO TIE THE WHOLE PASSAGE TOGETHER INTO A COHERENT COMPLETE INTEGRATED ARGUMENT. The meaning of and purpose of the background information about woman’s hair, men’s hair and bald heads. (Note: This section is taken directly from my Word Document on 1 Cor 11:2-16 so you will note it mentions Chapter 4 etc … This document is available by contacting me.) I

By - manan251

1 Corinthians 11:2-16 Instalment 4.

The Underlying Theology. Discussions about angels and exousia may be interesting BUT what is really important is that we understand and believe the Underlying Theology of the creation of man and woman that Paul presents in 1 Cor 11:2-16.  Introduction.A. It seems that the Corinthian church was basically doing what Paul had instructed them to do – women covering and

By - manan251

1 Corinthians 11:2-16 Instalment 3

Analysing and categorising the different types of arguments and information being used by Paul in 1 Cor 11:2-16 I have argued in the first 2 instalments and in further replies that Paul’s main argument is clear and direct “man ought not” and “woman ought to”. I have also argued that it is essential to delineate this main argument and to

By - manan251

1 Corinthians 11:2-16 Instalment 2

INSTALMENT 2 – Exegetically determining what “exousia/authority on the head” means. It is referrring to neither man’s authority nor to woman’s authority. What does 1 Cor 11:10 “authority on the head” mean? A SIMPLE EXEGETICAL PROPOSAL. I don’t intend to list the different views and translations, other than to say the fact that some translations need to add extra words into the

By - manan251

1 Corinthians 11:2-16 Instalment 1A & 1B

Word Order in 1 Cor 11:10-12 The Angels are in the Wrong Place. INSTALMENT 1A 1 Cor 11:1012 has some major issues that have rendered many opinions and much discussion. The 2 major ones are in verse 10. a. what is meant by the angels and in particular what is meant by it as a condition for a woman having exousia

By - manan251

1 Cor 11:5b,6 Why Paul is not being nasty. Why Paul is not saying that a woman not wearing a headcovering is like a prostitute. A practical reason and an exegetical reason.

It is nearly universally stated that Paul is comparing a woman without a head-covering (in church) to a a woman with a shaved head (presumably a prostitute). It thus seems that Paul is being exceedingly nasty, in that he is saying that the uncovered woman in church is just the same as (one and the same) a loose woman. It

By - manan251

Article 5 1 Cor 11:2-16 Working out the Structure.

Working out the Structure of 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 The 4 Types of Literature. Now, this is a detailed and intricate passage.  It seems to have theology in it,  it seems to have commands, it seems to have an argument from nature,  it has an argument based on what other churches are doing,  it even seems (some say) to have a

By - manan251

What is driving my approach to Genesis 1 & 2?

The connections between 1 Corinthians 11:1-16 and Genesis 1 & 2. My study started a year or two ago with an investigation into 1 Corinthians 11:1-16 and why Paul says women ought to wear a head-covering in church. [At a later date I will post some of my detailed exegesis on 1 Cor 11:1-16]. Paul in 1 Cor 11 says